Jamcracker

What are the critical challenges for the rail air line model to be sustainable? Before the occupancy model of Jamcracker could be established, it had to tackle a series of critical challenges. Foremost amongst them was the issue of timing, the risk of exposure Jamcracker might be delivering a new model of gain onward the world was ready for it. The model proposed was entirely a new food market mechanism for distributing ITServices and In order to succeed, the emerging markets warranted sufficient Infrastructure, economically possible Industry relationships and strong growth prospects which were all the more strained and perplex after the dot. com crash. Apart from timing issues the model faced severe technological roadblocks as well such as lack of established standards in the relatively young in asp industry which led to consolidation issues with Jamcracker platform.Apart from the above mention entry level problems, issues such as guide for rofessional services and cus tomer service were the dominant concerns which called for attention before the phone line model could be sustained. As the industry developed more and more people were getting involved. This called for services such as initial ashes configuration and integration which would be followed up by customer concerns regarding service level quality, privacy and security. Thus these were the critical challenges faced by the problem model before It could be sustained 2. How does Jamcracker fit in the asp (SaaS) space?Jamcracker analogous to Its name, tried to avoid IT log jams using web- ground technology, for its clients and give them to smoothly move towards their business objectives. Its business model was based on the widely anticipated growth of Application Service Providers, more popularly known as ASPS. ASPs provide various benefits to an organization such as speedy implementation of IT infrastructure, cost reduction, IT skilled workforce, 247 withstand etc. But given that these ASPs solved small IT problems for clients, Chandra along with subgenus Chen and Terbeek envisioned a nique space for Jamcracker In the ASP space.Although, Its model was based on ASP but Jamcracker was not an ASP Itself. It cooperated with ASP partners to comply application services through its enterprise I platTorm, JamcracKer Enterprlse, Into comprenenslve oTTerlngs. 3. How would you explain the business model of Jamcracker? As said above Jamcracker assumed the role of an ASP cafeteria wherein it partnered various specialized ASPs and using its enterprise IT platform, Jamcracker Enterprise rovided comprehensive solutions to the IT problems of its clients.In dewy-eyed terms, it aggregated the benefits of various ASPs and provided as one solution to the client. Since, Jamcracker presented these solutions to firms as IT segment in a box, the client had to Just maintain a single contractual relationship with Jamcracker rather than numerous relationships with specialized ASPS. So, a single interface with Jamcracker platform would suffice. Jamcrackers clients paid a per-user per-month fee for accessing Jamcrackers service nfrastructure and an additional per-user per-month fee for each application service that they chose to use.Also, a dispirited set up fee would be charged initially. Jamcracker did not commence to make large capital investments in developing and operating applications as it used the application services of its ASP partners. Although costs involved in engineering, service, sales and delivery were higher but economies were favorable. Also, adequate volumes allowed for generous margins as the incremental cost in serving a client was way less than doing the same for a new client..