Educationally Driven Assimilation Essay -- Education, Politics

The United States educational system has existed nearly unchanged for hundreds of years. As the system itself remains the same, the content in courses has non. The discussion of what courses should and should not be postulate or even offered has shifted into a question of politics. As the movement towards becoming more politically correct has expanded, so has its entrance upon the educational system. Education on racial issues, which was once deemed as necessary, are now being removed out. A university that feeds on fear-driven proposals offered by the politically correct movement ultimately decides to remove courses that may be falsely perceived as discriminatory. There is a single question that essential be asked due to this new trend. Is political nicety being use to target and remove racial issues from the classroom in an attempt to suck all cultures? Using three arguments, this paper will seek to stand up the idea that forcing political correctness into a class room removes racial issues, and attempts to pull in minorities. First, political correctness demands modification of both the educational structure, and of the student. Second, political correctness overhears both the language and moveions of individuals. Third, a discussion of white dominance is required to stop a forced assimilation and create a coarse respect of differences preferably. Although being politically correct appears to be good on face, the concept can be weaponized in an attempt to halt outcaste discussion. A highly regarded professor from Harvard was ultimately forced to stop go his class Peopling of America due to its focus on racial issues. (Taylor, 198). Although the Harvard professor was teaching the same course that ... ...the ideals of political correctness target and assimilate cultural differences. The ideals of being PC require followers to think alike, act alike, discuss things alike, and avoid all of the same questions. Uniformity is not the issue to solving cultural differences. When uniformity is preferred it creates a binary that allows individuals to be considered social function of the group or different. It is this categorization of individuals that allows the elite to manipulate and suppress against individuals in the United States. The elites can target a group and the bulk will find it justified as that group is not part of the unified. The alternative, however, is to allow discussions of difference to occur. If our society can grow to respect differences instead of try to assimilate them, then we will ultimately have a whole group that can include any form of minority.